Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
810 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

multithreading - How can I write a lock free structure?

In my multithreaded application and I see heavy lock contention in it, preventing good scalability across multiple cores. I have decided to use lock free programming to solve this.

How can I write a lock free structure?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Short answer is:

You cannot.

Long answer is:

If you are asking this question, you do not probably know enough to be able to create a lock free structure. Creating lock free structures is extremely hard, and only experts in this field can do it. Instead of writing your own, search for an existing implementation. When you find it, check how widely it is used, how well is it documented, if it is well proven, what are the limitations - even some lock free structure other people published are broken.

If you do not find a lock free structure corresponding to the structure you are currently using, rather adapt the algorithm so that you can use some existing one.

If you still insist on creating your own lock free structure, be sure to:

  • start with something very simple
  • understand memory model of your target platform (including read/write reordering constraints, what operations are atomic)
  • study a lot about problems other people encountered when implementing lock free structures
  • do not just guess if it will work, prove it
  • heavily test the result

More reading:

Lock free and wait free algorithms at Wikipedia

Herb Sutter: Lock-Free Code: A False Sense of Security


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

2.1m questions

2.1m answers

60 comments

56.7k users

...