java - How to create a JVM-global Singleton?

Question

I was drawn inspiration from this stackoverflow question

How can one create a Java class instance that is guaranteed to be available only once for the entire JVM process? Every Application that runs on that JVM should then be able to use that singleton instance.

Answer 1

You can as a matter of fact implement such a singleton. The problem that was described to you in the comments is the possibility of a class being loaded by multiple ClassLoaders. Each of these ClassLoaders can then define a class of identical name which would erroneously assume to be unique.

You can however avoid this by implementing an accessor to your singleton which explicitly relies on checking a specific ClassLoader for a class of a given name which again contains your singleton. This way, you can avoid that a singleton instance is provided by two different ClassLoaders and such duplicating the instance you required to be unique throughout the JVM.

For reasons that are explained later, we will split up the Singleton and the SingletonAccessor into two different classes. For the following class, we need to later make sure that we always access it by using a specific ClassLoader:

package pkg;
class Singleton {
  static volatile Singleton instance;
}

A convenient ClassLoader for this matter is the system class loader. The system class loader is aware of all classes on the JVM's class path and has per definition the extension and the bootstrap class loaders as its parents. Those two class loaders do not normally know about any classes that are domain-specific such as our Singleton class. This safes us from unwanted surprises. Furthermore, we know that it is accessible and known globally throughout a running instance of the JVM.

For now, let us assume that the Singleton class is on the class path. This way, we can receive the instance by this accessor using reflection:

class SingletonAccessor {
  static Object get() {
    Class<?> clazz = ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader()
                                .findClass("pkg.Singleton");
    Field field = clazz.getDeclaredField("instance");
    synchronized (clazz) {
      Object instance = field.get(null);
      if(instance == null) {
        instance = clazz.newInstance();
        field.set(null, instance);
      }
      return instance;
    }
  }
}

By specifying that we explicitly want to load pkg.Singleton from the system class loader, we make sure that we always receive the same instance despite of which class loader loaded our SingletonAccessor. In the above example, we additionally make sure that Singleton is only instantiated once. Alternatively, you could put the instantiation logic into the Singleton class itself and make the unused instances rot in case other Singleton classes are ever loaded.

There is however a big drawback. You miss all means of type-safety as you cannot assume that your code is always run from a ClassLoader which delegates the class loading of Singleton to the system class loader. This is in particularly true for an application run on an application server which often implements child-first semantics for its class loaders and does not ask the system class loader for known types but first tries to load its own types. Note that a runtime type is characterized by two features:

1. Its fully-qualified name
2. Its ClassLoader

For this reason, the SingletonAccessor::get method needs to return Object instead of Singleton.

Another drawback is the fact that the Singleton type must be found on the class path for this to work. Otherwise, the system class loader does not know about this type. If you can put the Singleton type onto the class path, you are done here. No problems.

If you cannot make this happen, there is however another way by using for example my code generation library Byte Buddy. Using this library, we can simply define such a type at runtime and inject it into the system class loader:

new ByteBuddy()
  .subclass(Object.class)
  .name("pkg.Singleton")
  .defineField("instance", Object.class, Ownership.STATIC)
  .make()
  .load(ClassLoader.getSytemClassLoader(), 
        ClassLoadingStrategy.Default.INJECTION)

You just defined a class pkg.Singleton for the system class loader and the above strategy is applicable again.

Also, you can avoid the type-safety issues by implementing a wrapper type. You can also automatize this with the help of Byte Buddy:

new ByteBuddy()
  .subclass(Singleton.class)
  .method(any())
  .intercept(new Object() {
    @RuntimeType
    Object intercept(@Origin Method m, 
                     @AllArguments Object[] args) throws Exception {
      Object singleton = SingletonAccessor.get();
      return singleton.getClass()
        .getDeclaredMethod(m.getName(), m.getParameterTypes())
        .invoke(singleton, args);
    }
  })
  .make()
  .load(Singleton.class.getClassLoader(), 
        ClassLoadingStrategy.Default.INJECTION)
  .getLoaded()
  .newInstance();

You just created a delegator which overrides all methods of the Singleton class and delegates their invocation to invocations of the JVM-global singleton instance. Note that we need to reload the reflective methods even though they are signature-identical because we cannot rely on the ClassLoaders of the delegate and the JVM-global classes to be the same.

In practice, you might want to cache the calls to SingletonAccessor.get() and maybe even the reflective method look-ups (which are rather expensive compared to the reflective method invocations). But this need depends highly on your application domain. If you have trouble with your constructor hierarchy, you could also factor out the method signatures into an interface and implement this interface for both the above accessor and your Singleton class.