Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
377 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python - Using an OrderedDict in **kwargs

Is it possible to pass an OrderedDict instance to a function which uses the **kwargs syntax and retain the ordering?

What I'd like to do is :

def I_crave_order(**kwargs):
    for k, v in kwargs.items():
        print k, v

example = OrderedDict([('first', 1), ('second', 2), ('third', -1)])

I_crave_order(**example)
>> first 1
>> second 2
>> third -1

However the actual result is:

>> second 2
>> third -1
>> first 1

ie, typical random dict ordering.

I have other uses where setting the order explicitly is good, so I want to keep **kwargs and not just pass the OrderedDict as a regular argument

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

As of Python 3.6, the keyword argument order is preserved. Before 3.6, it is not possible since the OrderedDict gets turned into a dict.


The first thing to realize is that the value you pass in **example does not automatically become the value in **kwargs. Consider this case, where kwargs will only have part of example:

def f(a, **kwargs):
    pass
example = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
f(**example)

Or this case, where it will have more values than those in example:

example = {'b': 2}
f(a=1, c=3, **example)

Or even no overlap at all:

example = {'a': 1}
f(b=2, **example)

So, what you're asking for doesn't really make sense.

Still, it might be nice if there were some way to specify that you want an ordered **kwargs, no matter where the keywords came from—explicit keyword args in the order they appear, followed by all of the items of **example in the order they appear in example (which could be arbitrary if example were a dict, but could also be meaningful if it were an OrderedDict).

Defining all the fiddly details, and keeping the performance acceptable, turns out to be harder than it sounds. See PEP 468, and the linked threads, for some discussion on the idea. It seems to have stalled this time around, but if someone picks it up and champions it (and writes a reference implementation for people to play with—which depends on an OrderedDict accessible from the C API, but that will hopefully be there in 3.5+), I suspect it would eventually get into the language.


By the way, note that if this were possible, it would almost certainly be used in the constructor for OrderedDict itself. But if you try that, all you're doing is freezing some arbitrary order as the permanent order:

>>> d = OrderedDict(a=1, b=2, c=3)
OrderedDict([('a', 1), ('c', 3), ('b', 2)])

Meanwhile, what options do you have?

Well, the obvious option is just to pass example as a normal argument instead of unpacking it:

def f(example):
    pass
example = OrderedDict([('a', 1), ('b', 2)])
f(example)

Or, of course, you can use *args and pass the items as tuples, but that's generally uglier.

There might be some other workarounds in the threads linked from the PEP, but really, none of them are going to be better than this. (Except…?IIRC, Li Haoyi came up with a solution based on his MacroPy to pass order-retaining keyword arguments, but I don't remember the details. MacroPy solutions in general are awesome if you're willing to use MacroPy and write code that doesn't quite read like Python, but that isn't always appropriate…)


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...