Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
524 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c - Real-time awareness of timezone change in localtime() vs localtime_r()

Working on an Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS box, I just noticed that localtime() and localtime_r() behave differently when the system's timezone changes during the lifetime of a process: localtime() picks up the timezone change immediately, whereas localtime_r() does not, it seems to stick to what was the timezone at the launch of the process. Is this expected behavior? I haven't seen this covered anywhere.

More precisely, when I use the following code ...

#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>

int main() {
  while (1) {
    time_t t = time(NULL);
    struct tm *tm = localtime(&t);
    printf("localtime:%02d/%02d/%02d-%02d:%02d:%02d
",
           tm->tm_mon + 1, tm->tm_mday, tm->tm_year + 1900,
           tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec);
    sleep(1);
  }
  return 0;
}

... and change the timezone from UTC via ...

# echo 'Europe/Berlin' > /etc/timezone 
# sudo dpkg-reconfigure --frontend noninteractive tzdata

... then the code produces the following, ...

localtime:10/04/2013-01:11:33
localtime:10/04/2013-01:11:34
localtime:10/04/2013-01:11:35
localtime:10/03/2013-23:11:36
localtime:10/03/2013-23:11:37
localtime:10/03/2013-23:11:38

... but if I use:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>

int main() {
  while (1) {
    time_t t = time(NULL);
    struct tm local_tm;
    struct tm *tm = localtime_r(&t, &local_tm);    
    printf("localtime_r:%02d/%02d/%02d-%02d:%02d:%02d
",
           tm->tm_mon + 1, tm->tm_mday, tm->tm_year + 1900,
           tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec);
    sleep(1);
  }
  return 0;
}

... then there's no change when doing a similar timezone change:

localtime_r:10/04/2013-01:15:37
localtime_r:10/04/2013-01:15:38
localtime_r:10/04/2013-01:15:39
localtime_r:10/04/2013-01:15:40
localtime_r:10/04/2013-01:15:41
localtime_r:10/04/2013-01:15:42

UPDATE: adding a call to tzset() before invoking localtime_r() produces the expected behavior. Whether that's clear from the spec/manpage or not (see discussion below) is a question for mentalhealth.stackexchange.com...

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

See this following documentation:

The localtime() function converts the calendar time timep to broken-down time representation, expressed relative to the user's specified timezone. The function acts as if it called tzset(3) and sets the external variables tzname with information about the current timezone, timezone with the difference between Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) and local standard time in seconds, and daylight to a nonzero value if daylight savings time rules apply during some part of the year. The return value points to a statically allocated struct which might be overwritten by subsequent calls to any of the date and time functions. The localtime_r() function does the same, but stores the data in a user-supplied struct. It need not set tzname, timezone, and daylight.

From: http://linux.die.net/man/3/localtime_r

So as far as I can tell, it appears that the code is working as I'd expect.

Edited to add more from the same documentation:

According to POSIX.1-2004, localtime() is required to behave as though tzset(3) was called, while localtime_r() does not have this requirement. For portable code tzset(3) should be called before localtime_r().


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...