Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
499 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python - Applying SVD throws a Memory Error instantaneously?

I am trying to apply SVD on my matrix (3241 x 12596) that was obtained after some text processing (with the ultimate goal of performing Latent Semantic Analysis) and I am unable to understand why this is happening as my 64-bit machine has 16GB RAM. The moment svd(self.A) is called, it throws an error. The precise error is given below:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File ".SVD.py", line 985, in <module>
    _svd.calc()
  File ".SVD.py", line 534, in calc
    self.U, self.S, self.Vt = svd(self.A)
  File "C:Python26libsite-packagesscipylinalgdecomp_svd.py", line 81, in svd
    overwrite_a = overwrite_a)
MemoryError

So I tried using

self.U, self.S, self.Vt = svd(self.A, full_matrices= False)

and this time, it throws the following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File ".SVD.py", line 985, in <module>
    _svd.calc()
  File ".SVD.py", line 534, in calc
    self.U, self.S, self.Vt = svd(self.A, full_matrices= False)
  File "C:Python26libsite-packagesscipylinalgdecomp_svd.py", line 71, in svd
    return numpy.linalg.svd(a, full_matrices=0, compute_uv=compute_uv)
  File "C:Python26libsite-packages
umpylinalglinalg.py", line 1317, in svd
    work = zeros((lwork,), t)
MemoryError

Is this supposed to be such a large matrix that Numpy cannot handle and is there something that I can do at this stage without changing the methodology itself?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Yes, the full_matrices parameter to scipy.linalg.svd is important: your input is highly rank-deficient (rank max 3,241), so you don't want to allocate the entire 12,596 x 12,596 matrix for V!

More importantly, matrices coming from text processing are likely very sparse. The scipy.linalg.svd is dense and doesn't offer truncated SVD, which results in a) tragic performance and b) lots of wasted memory.

Have a look at the sparseSVD package from PyPI, which works over sparse input and you can ask for top K factors only. Or try scipy.sparse.linalg.svd, though that's not as efficient and only available in newer versions of scipy.

Or, to avoid the gritty details completely, use a package that does efficient LSA for you transparently, such as gensim.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...