From the Java Language specification:
The access modifiers protected and private pertain only to member classes within a directly enclosing class declaration
So yes, the private and the protected modifiers are not allowed for top level class declarations.
Top-level classes may be public or not, while private
and protected
are not allowed. If the class is declared public, then it can be referred to from any package. Otherwise it can only be referred to from the same package (namespace).
A private top level class wouldn't make much sense because it couldn't be referred to from any class. It would be unusable by definition. private
is OK for member classes to make a class referable to only it's enclosing class.
A protected member class can be referred to from (1) any class of the same package and from (2) any subclass of the enclosing class. Mapping this concept to top level classes is difficult. The first case is covered by top level class with no access modifiers. The second case is not applicable for top level classes, because there is no enclosing class or something else from a different package with a special relation to this class (like a subclass). Because of this I think, protected
is not allowed because it's underlying concept is not applicable for top level classes.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…