Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
530 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

sql - Pairwise array sum aggregate function?

I have a table with arrays as one column, and I want to sum the array elements together:

> create table regres(a int[] not null);
> insert into regres values ('{1,2,3}'), ('{9, 12, 13}');
> select * from regres;
     a
-----------
 {1,2,3}
 {9,12,13}

I want the result to be:

{10, 14, 16}

that is: {1 + 9, 2 + 12, 3 + 13}.

Does such a function already exist somewhere? The intagg extension looked like a good candidate, but such a function does not already exist.

The arrays are expected to be between 24 and 31 elements in length, all elements are NOT NULL, and the arrays themselves will also always be NOT NULL. All elements are basic int. There will be more than two rows per aggregate. All arrays will have the same number of elements, in a query. Different queries will have different number of elements.

My implementation target is: PostgreSQL 9.1.13

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

General solutions for any number of arrays with any number of elements. Individual elements or the the whole array can be NULL, too:

Simpler in 9.4+ using WITH ORDINALITY

SELECT ARRAY (
   SELECT sum(elem)
   FROM  tbl t
       , unnest(t.arr) WITH ORDINALITY x(elem, rn)
   GROUP BY rn
   ORDER BY rn
   );

See:

Postgres 9.3+

This makes use of an implicit LATERAL JOIN

SELECT ARRAY (
   SELECT sum(arr[rn])
   FROM   tbl t
        , generate_subscripts(t.arr, 1) AS rn
   GROUP  BY rn
   ORDER  BY rn
   );

See:

Postgres 9.1

SELECT ARRAY (
   SELECT sum(arr[rn])
   FROM  (
      SELECT arr, generate_subscripts(arr, 1) AS rn
      FROM   tbl t
      ) sub
   GROUP  BY rn
   ORDER  BY rn
   );

The same works in later versions, but set-returning functions in the SELECT list are not standard SQL and were frowned upon by some. Should be OK since Postgres 10, though. See:

db<>fiddle here
Old sqlfiddle

Related:


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...