inheritance - Java: Why doesn't deserialization invoke constructor & what's the best workaround?

Question

The Java serialization spec for Java 1.5 said:

For serializable objects, the no-arg constructor for the first non-serializable supertype is run. For serializable classes, the fields are initialized to the default value appropriate for its type. Then the fields of each class are restored by calling class-specific readObject methods, or if these are not defined, by calling the defaultReadObject method. Note that field initializers and constructors are not executed for serializable classes during deserialization.

However, this means if we put a static variable (for example a counter variable) inside the class, it will not be updated as normally would:

class Foo {
    static int t;

    public Foo() {
        t++;
    }
}

public class Bar extends Foo implements Serializable {
    static int t;

    public Bar() {
        t++;
    }
}

In this case, if one instance of Bar is deserialized, then the counter for Foo is correct and the counter for Bar is off-by-one.

I wonder why does deserialization does not invoke the constructor? Since it seems that while this will gain a bit on speed, it can cause potential problems. The compiler could be easily designed to produce a "static constructor" that only updates the static variables that will be updated and does not rely on outside information when the class is loaded.

Also, I wonder what is the best way to avoid this? The solution I can think of is packing the deserialization with the operation on the static variable.

Thanks for any inputs in advance!

Answer 1

Deserialization doesn't invoke the constructor because the purpose of it is to express the state of the object as it was serialized, running constructor code could interfere with that.