You can do something like this, if thats your concern, I guess. Never tried it, its just a wild guess. But thats the usual practice -- I follow for Named Queries; yes, that's a different thing altogether.
@Entity
@Table(name = Database.tableName)
public class Database implements Serializable {
public static final String tableName = "TABLE_1";
...............
}
But I don't see why anyone would do that. Could you tell us what are you up to? Why you have few tables exactly same definition?
[Edited]
I tried your solution. It did not
work, it says: The value for
annotation attribute Table.name must
be a constant expression.
So, isn't that clear enough? I mean you can't do that. And I believe its quite logical. If you want Hibernate to generate your schema then you can define all the entities you want, in the schema, and with the appropriate relationships.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…