I noticed that when supplying column indices to dplyr::summarize_at
the column to be summarized is determined excluding the grouping column(s). I wonder if that is how it's supposed to be since by this design, using the correct column index depends on whether the summarising column(s) are positioned before or after the grouping columns.
Here's an example:
library(dplyr)
data("mtcars")
# grouping column after summarise columns
mtcars %>% group_by(gear) %>% summarise_at(3:4, mean)
## A tibble: 3 x 3
# gear disp hp
# <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#1 3 326.3000 176.1333
#2 4 123.0167 89.5000
#3 5 202.4800 195.6000
# grouping columns before summarise columns
mtcars %>% group_by(cyl) %>% summarise_at(3:4, mean)
## A tibble: 3 x 3
# cyl hp drat
# <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#1 4 82.63636 4.070909
#2 6 122.28571 3.585714
#3 8 209.21429 3.229286
# no grouping columns
mtcars %>% summarise_at(3:4, mean)
# disp hp
#1 230.7219 146.6875
# actual third & fourth columns
names(mtcars)[3:4]
#[1] "disp" "hp"
packageVersion("dplyr")
#[1] ‘0.7.2’
Notice how the summarised columns change depending on grouping and position of the grouping column.
Is this the same on other platforms? Is it a bug or a feature?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…