tk.mainloop() blocks. It means that execution of your Python commands halts there. You can see that by writing:
while 1:
ball.draw()
tk.mainloop()
print("hello") #NEW CODE
time.sleep(0.01)
You will never see the output from the print statement. Because there is no loop, the ball doesn't move.
On the other hand, the methods update_idletasks() and update() here:
while True:
ball.draw()
tk.update_idletasks()
tk.update()
...do not block; after those methods finish, execution will continue, so the while loop will execute over and over, which makes the ball move.
An infinite loop containing the method calls update_idletasks() and update() can act as a substitute for calling tk.mainloop(). Note that the whole while loop can be said to block just like tk.mainloop() because nothing after the while loop will execute.
However, tk.mainloop() is not a substitute for just the lines:
tk.update_idletasks()
tk.update()
Rather, tk.mainloop() is a substitute for the whole while loop:
while True:
tk.update_idletasks()
tk.update()
Response to comment:
Here is what the tcl docs say:
Update idletasks
This subcommand of update flushes all currently-scheduled idle events
from Tcl's event queue. Idle events are used to postpone processing
until “there is nothing else to do”, with the typical use case for
them being Tk's redrawing and geometry recalculations. By postponing
these until Tk is idle, expensive redraw operations are not done until
everything from a cluster of events (e.g., button release, change of
current window, etc.) are processed at the script level. This makes Tk
seem much faster, but if you're in the middle of doing some long
running processing, it can also mean that no idle events are processed
for a long time. By calling update idletasks, redraws due to internal
changes of state are processed immediately. (Redraws due to system
events, e.g., being deiconified by the user, need a full update to be
processed.)
APN As described in Update considered harmful, use of update to handle
redraws not handled by update idletasks has many issues. Joe English
in a comp.lang.tcl posting describes an alternative:
So update_idletasks() causes some subset of events to be processed that update() causes to be processed.
From the update docs:
update ?idletasks?
The update command is used to bring the application “up to date” by
entering the Tcl event loop repeatedly until all pending events
(including idle callbacks) have been processed.
If the idletasks keyword is specified as an argument to the command,
then no new events or errors are processed; only idle callbacks are
invoked. This causes operations that are normally deferred, such as
display updates and window layout calculations, to be performed
immediately.
KBK (12 February 2000) -- My personal opinion is that the [update]
command is not one of the best practices, and a programmer is well
advised to avoid it. I have seldom if ever seen a use of [update] that
could not be more effectively programmed by another means, generally
appropriate use of event callbacks. By the way, this caution applies
to all the Tcl commands (vwait and tkwait are the other common
culprits) that enter the event loop recursively, with the exception of
using a single [vwait] at global level to launch the event loop inside
a shell that doesn't launch it automatically.
The commonest purposes for which I've seen [update] recommended are:
- Keeping the GUI alive while some long-running calculation is
executing. See Countdown program for an alternative. 2) Waiting for a window to be configured before doing things like
geometry management on it. The alternative is to bind on events such
as that notify the process of a window's geometry. See
Centering a window for an alternative.
What's wrong with update? There are several answers. First, it tends
to complicate the code of the surrounding GUI. If you work the
exercises in the Countdown program, you'll get a feel for how much
easier it can be when each event is processed on its own callback.
Second, it's a source of insidious bugs. The general problem is that
executing [update] has nearly unconstrained side effects; on return
from [update], a script can easily discover that the rug has been
pulled out from under it. There's further discussion of this
phenomenon over at Update considered harmful.
.....
Is there any chance I can make my program work without the while loop?
Yes, but things get a little tricky. You might think something like the following would work:
class Ball:
def __init__(self, canvas, color):
self.canvas = canvas
self.id = canvas.create_oval(10, 10, 25, 25, fill=color)
self.canvas.move(self.id, 245, 100)
def draw(self):
while True:
self.canvas.move(self.id, 0, -1)
ball = Ball(canvas, "red")
ball.draw()
tk.mainloop()
The problem is that ball.draw() will cause execution to enter an infinite loop in the draw() method, so tk.mainloop() will never execute, and your widgets will never display. In gui programming, infinite loops have to be avoided at all costs in order to keep the widgets responsive to user input, e.g. mouse clicks.
So, the question is: how do you execute something over and over again without actually creating an infinite loop? Tkinter has an answer for that problem: a widget's after() method:
from Tkinter import *
import random
import time
tk = Tk()
tk.title = "Game"
tk.resizable(0,0)
tk.wm_attributes("-topmost", 1)
canvas = Canvas(tk, width=500, height=400, bd=0, highlightthickness=0)
canvas.pack()
class Ball:
def __init__(self, canvas, color):
self.canvas = canvas
self.id = canvas.create_oval(10, 10, 25, 25, fill=color)
self.canvas.move(self.id, 245, 100)
def draw(self):
self.canvas.move(self.id, 0, -1)
self.canvas.after(1, self.draw) #(time_delay, method_to_execute)
ball = Ball(canvas, "red")
ball.draw() #Changed per Bryan Oakley's comment
tk.mainloop()
The after() method doesn't block (it actually creates another thread of execution), so execution continues on in your python program after after() is called, which means tk.mainloop() executes next, so your widgets get configured and displayed. The after() method also allows your widgets to remain responsive to other user input. Try running the following program, and then click your mouse on different spots on the canvas:
from Tkinter import *
import random
import time
root = Tk()
root.title = "Game"
root.resizable(0,0)
root.wm_attributes("-topmost", 1)
canvas = Canvas(root, width=500, height=400, bd=0, highlightthickness=0)
canvas.pack()
class Ball:
def __init__(self, canvas, color):
self.canvas = canvas
self.id = canvas.create_oval(10, 10, 25, 25, fill=color)
self.canvas.move(self.id, 245, 100)
self.canvas.bind("<Button-1>", self.canvas_onclick)
self.text_id = self.canvas.create_text(300, 200, anchor='se')
self.canvas.itemconfig(self.text_id, text='hello')
def canvas_onclick(self, event):
self.canvas.itemconfig(
self.text_id,
text="You clicked at ({}, {})".format(event.x, event.y)
)
def draw(self):
self.canvas.move(self.id, 0, -1)
self.canvas.after(50, self.draw)
ball = Ball(canvas, "red")
ball.draw() #Changed per Bryan Oakley's comment.
root.mainloop()
