I agree that this is a really bad design.
Try this if you can't change that design:
select distinct id, trim(regexp_substr(value,'[^,]+', 1, level) ) value, level
from tbl1
connect by regexp_substr(value, '[^,]+', 1, level) is not null
order by id, level;
OUPUT
id value level
1 AA 1
1 UT 2
1 BT 3
1 SK 4
1 SX 5
2 AA 1
2 UT 2
2 SX 3
3 UT 1
3 SK 2
3 SX 3
3 ZF 4
Credits to this
To remove duplicates in a more elegant and efficient way (credits to @mathguy)
select id, trim(regexp_substr(value,'[^,]+', 1, level) ) value, level
from tbl1
connect by regexp_substr(value, '[^,]+', 1, level) is not null
and PRIOR id = id
and PRIOR SYS_GUID() is not null
order by id, level;
If you want an "ANSIer" approach go with a CTE:
with t (id,res,val,lev) as (
select id, trim(regexp_substr(value,'[^,]+', 1, 1 )) res, value as val, 1 as lev
from tbl1
where regexp_substr(value, '[^,]+', 1, 1) is not null
union all
select id, trim(regexp_substr(val,'[^,]+', 1, lev+1) ) res, val, lev+1 as lev
from t
where regexp_substr(val, '[^,]+', 1, lev+1) is not null
)
select id, res,lev
from t
order by id, lev;
OUTPUT
id val lev
1 AA 1
1 UT 2
1 BT 3
1 SK 4
1 SX 5
2 AA 1
2 UT 2
2 SX 3
3 UT 1
3 SK 2
3 SX 3
3 ZF 4
Another recursive approach by MT0 but without regex:
WITH t ( id, value, start_pos, end_pos ) AS
( SELECT id, value, 1, INSTR( value, ',' ) FROM tbl1
UNION ALL
SELECT id,
value,
end_pos + 1,
INSTR( value, ',', end_pos + 1 )
FROM t
WHERE end_pos > 0
)
SELECT id,
SUBSTR( value, start_pos, DECODE( end_pos, 0, LENGTH( value ) + 1, end_pos ) - start_pos ) AS value
FROM t
ORDER BY id,
start_pos;
I've tried 3 approaches with a 30000 rows dataset and 118104 rows returned and got the following average results:
- My recursive approach: 5 seconds
- MT0 approach: 4 seconds
- Mathguy approach: 16 seconds
- MT0 recursive approach no-regex: 3.45 seconds
@Mathguy has also tested with a bigger dataset:
In all cases the recursive query (I only tested the one with regular
substr and instr) does better, by a factor of 2 to 5. Here are the
combinations of # of strings / tokens per string and CTAS execution
times for hierarchical vs. recursive, hierarchical first. All times in
seconds
- 30,000 x 4: 5 / 1.
- 30,000 x 10: 15 / 3.
- 30,000 x 25: 56 / 37.
- 5,000 x 50: 33 / 14.
- 5,000 x 100: 160 / 81.
- 10,000 x 200: 1,924 / 772