Your usage example container_of(dev, struct wifi_device, dev);
might be a bit misleading as you are mixing two namespaces there.
While the first dev
in your example refers to the name of pointer the second dev
refers to the name of a structure member.
Most probably this mix up is provoking all that headache. In fact the member
parameter in your quote refers to the name given to that member in the container structure.
Taking this container for example:
struct container {
int some_other_data;
int this_data;
}
And a pointer int *my_ptr
to the this_data
member you'd use the macro to get a pointer to struct container *my_container
by using:
struct container *my_container;
my_container = container_of(my_ptr, struct container, this_data);
Taking the offset of this_data
to the beginning of the struct into account is essential to getting the correct pointer location.
Effectively you just have to subtract the offset of the member this_data
from your pointer my_ptr
to get the correct location.
That's exactly what the last line of the macro does.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…